Sunday, December 09, 2007

Gay Activists Take A Page Out Of Hitler's Mein Kampf To Evict Boy Scouts From Philadelphia Headquarters

The James Hartline Report
- On The Frontlines Of The Culture War -
December 10, 2007

Gay Activists Take A Page Out Of Hitler's Mein Kampf:

Reminding America Of How Bad Persecution Can Get,
Boy Scouts Are Evicted From Their Philadelphia Headquarters
Because They Will Not Promote Homosexuality To Their Youth

(JHReport) Historians have termed it "The Night of the Broken Glass." It was a night that saw the darkest aspects of humanity form into an event called the Kristallnacht. Nazi persecution and perverted oppression of German Jews culminated in the Kristallnacht, an event that began Adolph Hitler's final demonic push to eradicate all humans whom he deemed unworthy to extist in the land of the living.

On November 9, 1938, the Nazis unleashed a wave of pogroms against Germany's Jews. Within a few hours, thousands of synagogues, Jewish businesses and homes were damanged or destroyed. Though portrayed as spontaneous outbursts of popular outrage, these pogroms were calculated acts of retaliation carried out by the SA, SS, and other Nazi party organizations. What began as a political plot against the Jews after Austria had been incorporated into the third Reich in March 1938 had finally culminated into the violent uprising of the Kristallnacht night of terror.

Fast forward to December, 2007: many Americans who remember the dark deeds committed by Germany's Nazi Party, are now seeing a similar pattern arise in metropolitan communities throughout the United States. Instead of synagogues and Jewish-owned businesses, the target of such persecution has now become the Boy Scouts of America. The latest of such targeted attacks against the Boy Scouts has occurred in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. In an incredible act of injustice, the City Council of Philadelphia, acting on behalf of a propaganda campaign being waged by the city's gay and lesbian movement, has voted to evict the Boy Scouts from their downtown headquarters.

The Cradle of Liberty Council, located in downtown Philadelphia, is one of the largest Boy Scout Councils in the United States. Serving over 69,000 young children, the Cradle of Liberty Council is housed in the center of what is hailed as the birthplace of the Boy Scouts. The Scouts have been located in their current downtown Philadelphia location since 1929 and have received contributions from Hellen Keller, Babe Ruth and Winston Churchill during their many years of helping the youth of Philadelphia.

Advocating good citizenship, character development, friendly service and spiritual growth, the Philadelphia-based organization has endeavored to raise up generations of young men to make positive contributions to society. However, those contributions were not enough for the current Philadelphia City Council. Bowing to pressure from radical homosexual groups, the council decided to raise the rent on the Scouts to $200,000 per year if they did not allow the promotion of homosexuality within their youth programs. The Philadelphia City Council would have made Hitler proud if they had made this kind of decision in 1930's Germany.

In an interview with the New York Times, The Cradle of Liberty Council spokesman Jeff Jubelirer questioned the timing of the city's move. "With an epidemic of gun violence taking the lives of Philadelphia's children every day, it is ironic the administration chose this time to destroy programming that services 69,000 children in the city," Jubelirer said.

Jubelirer also said it could not afford $200,000 a year in rent, and that such a price would require it to cut summer-camp funds for 800 needy children. He added that the organization serves more than 69,000 young people, mostly from the inner city, and that its programming focuses on mentoring and after-school programs instead of camping trips.

Stacey Sobel, executive director of Philadelphia's Center for Lesbian and Gay Civil Rights, said she's pleased the city is taking action. "If they are going to discriminate, the taxpayers shouldn't be subsidizing it," Sobel told the New York Times.

The Boy Scouts of America's policy on gay leaders was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2000. In 2003, the council in Philadelphia said it would adopt a nondiscrimination policy on gays. However, weeks later the group dismissed an 18-year-old Scout who publicly acknowledged he was involved in homosexuality.

The Cradle of Liberty council has a clearly articulated non-discrimination policy which reads: "Prejudice, intolerance and unlawful discrimination in any form are unacceptable within ranks of Cradle of Liberty Council."

While the non-discrimination policy satisfies most rational Americans, the fact that the promotion of homosexuality is not being mentioned, was enough to cause radical homosexual activists to push forth their tyrannical agenda via the Philadelphia City Council's ruling against the Scouts.

One of the most outspoken critics of the Cradle of Liberty Boy Scouts has been Philadelphia's City Solicitor Romulo L. Diaz Jr. As Philadelphia's City Attorney, Romulo Diaz has publicly demanded that the scouts specifically include a non-discrimination policy that mentions the term "gay." Romulo L. Diaz, a homosexual and former official with President Clinton's office, has a biased agenda against those who oppose his homosexuality. According to Fox News, Diaz made these comments regarding the Scout's refusal to accomodate his pro-homosexual agenda:

"They had been put on notice over the last year by the mayor, the City Council and the Fairmount Park Commission that they had a choice to make," Diaz said in a phone interview. "They need to provide evidence that they would not engage in discriminatory practices against gays as either Scout masters or Boy Scouts. .... They have either not responded or essentially played the victim."

The campaign against the Philadelphia Boy Scouts is one of many such efforts being carried out against traditional groups in America by radical homosexual activist organizations. Churches, youth programs and schools throughout America are under assault by homosexual and lesbian activists who are demanding that all children be indoctrinated into the gay lifestyle. For many older Americans, it is a chilling experience to watch familes and their children forced out of programs by goverment officials who are acting on behalf of the homosexual movement. These older Americans have seen this all before: Nazi Germany 1933-1945.

In the same manner used by the Nazis when they began to evict Jews from their homes, businesses and synagogues, city officials acting on behalf of their homosexual partners, are engaged in the same insidious actions. From the recent Philadelphia case to the ACLU's pro-gay efforts to remove the Boy Scouts from public parks in San Diego, California, homosexual activists are incrementally seeking to marginalize and remove all entities that do not bow to their radicalized agenda.

It is important to inspect the ideology behind these attacks against the Boy Scouts. In reality, many of these attacks are being orchestrated by those who are vehemently atheistic and anti-christian. Indeed, it has been a good fit for those who embrace a certain anti-religious bigotry to hide behind the gay rights issue as a means for accomplishing their goal of secularizing America.

John Simkin, in his insightful website Spartacus Educational, details tactics used by Hitler that are stunningly similar to those being used by gay activists in America to erode the establishment of groups like the Boy Scouts:

"Once in power Adolf Hitler began to openly express anti-Semitic ideas. Based on his readings of how blacks were denied civil rights in the southern states in America, Hitler attempted to make life so unpleasant for Jews in Germany that they would emigrate. The campaign started on April 1, 1933, when a one-day boycott of Jewish-owned shops took place. Members of the Sturm Abteilung (SA) picketed the shops to ensure the boycott was successful.

"The hostility towards Jews increased in Germany. This was reflected in the decision by many shops and restaurants not to serve the Jewish population. Placards saying "Jews not admitted" and "Jews enter this place at their own risk" began to appear all over Germany. In some parts of the country Jews were banned from public parks, swimming-pools and public transport."

The Swastika - Rainbow Flag Connection

There are tremendous similarities between early members of Germany's Nazi Party and fringe elements of America's gay rights movement. Homosexual activists are leading boycotts of businesses that refuse to promote homosexuality. And they are identifying pro-gay businesses with rainbow flags much like Nazis identified their sympathizers with the swastika.

In San Diego, California, a number of registered sex offenders were found to be supervisors in the city's Gay Pride organization during the 2005 San Diego Gay Pride Festival. In that city, there continues to be a number of homosexual groups that target youth for sexual indoctrination. At the same time, many of these gay activists are seen dressing up in attire eerily similar to the uniforms worn by members of Hitler's Nazi armies. On the Mr. Leather San Diego website, just like hundreds of other homosexual websites, male contestants can be seen wearing uniforms closely resembling those worn by Nazi officers.

In Scott D. Lively's shocking expose entitled "The Pink Swastika," a disturbing picture is painted of rampant homosexuality and pedophilia that operated within Nazi Germany. In the Pink Swastika, Dr. Lively details Germany's Gestapo reporting forty cases of man-boy erotic relationships (pederasty) in just one troop of Hitler Youth in 1934. Dr. Lively quotes extensively from Hanz Bleuel, the architect of much of Germany's 20th century embracement of Wandervoegel, a homosexual youth movement. Understanding the Wandervoegel Movement is critical to understanding how homosexuality fueled much of the sadistic components of Hitler's Nazi army -- and why rabid gay activists are targeting youth groups like the Boy Scouts for sexual indoctrination.

Scott Lively writes in his book that Hans Bleuel documented the case of one supervisor, a 20 year-old man who was dismissed from the Hitler Youth in 1938. Yet, he was transferred to the National Socialist Flying Corps (Civil Air Patrol) and was assigned to supervise work by members of the Hitler Youth Gliding Association and eventually detained to help with physical check-ups. The man was once again caught sodomizing young men, but was not dismissed from the NSFK” (the National Socialist Flying Corps).

Conditions were essentially the same in 1941. Bleuel reports of another homosexual flying instructor involved in “at least ten cases of homosexuality with student pilots of the Hitler Youth” and “a student teacher and student ...[who] had committed twenty-eight proven acts of indecency with twenty boys at Hitler Youth and Young Folk camps." He adds that “these cases were only the tip of the iceberg, for few misdemeanors within the Party became public in later years and even fewer came to trial.”

According to Scott Lively, homosexuality continued to spread inside of Hitler's troops during the war years when Hitler's Jugend boys frequently became victims of molestations at the hands of SS tutors. While Heinrich Himmler, the head of the SS, consistently took a hardline against it publicly, he was quite willing to mitigate his penalties privately and keep every incident as secret as possible.

Next to Adolph Hitler, Ernst Roehm was the man in Germany most responsible for the rise of Nazism. A driving force behind the National Socialist movement, Roehm was one of the early founders of the Nazi Party. Both Roehm and Hitler had been members of the socialist terrorist group called the Iron Fist. In his classic Nazi history, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, author William Shirer describes Ernst Roehm as “a stocky, bull-necked, piggish-eyed, scar-faced professional soldier...[and] like so many of the early Nazis, a homosexual”. Roehm was recruited into homosexuality by Gerhard Rossbach.

Roehm, as the head of 2,500,000 Storm Troops had surrounded himself with a staff of Nazi perverts. His chiefs, men of rank of Gruppenfuehrer or Obergruppenfuehrer, commanding units of several hundred thousand Storm Troopers, were almost without exception homosexuals. Indeed, unless a Storm Troop officer were homosexual he had no chance of advancement.

California - Schwarzengger - The Nazi Connection

The disasterous pro-homosexual laws currently being implemented in California could just as easily have been written in Hitler's Germany. California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has a history of close ties to those involved in Nazism. In fact, Schwarznegger's father, Gustav Schwarzenegger, was a volunteer member of the Sturmabteilung, or SA — the notorious Nazi storm troopers also known as brownshirts.

One new radicalized piece of legislation that Schwarznegger just signed into law is the controversial SB777. According to World Net Daily, SB777 bans anything in California's public schools that could be interpreted as negative toward homosexuality, bisexuality and other alternative lifestyle choices. "SB 777 will result in reverse discrimination against students with religious and traditional family values," said Meredith Turney, legislative liaison for Capitol Resource Institute. "These students have lost their voice as the direct result of Gov. Schwarzenegger's unbelievable decision. The terms 'mom and dad' or 'husband and wife' could promote discrimination against homosexuals if a same-sex couple is not also featured."

Governor Schwarznegger has repeatedly signed legislation in California which promotes the extremist desires of the radical homosexual movement at the expense of the constitutional rights of Christians who oppose such sexual indoctrination. Like his Nazi counterparts, Schwarzenegger has been quietly laying the foundation for a public educational system that is creating an army of children representative of Germany in the 1930's. To better understand Schwarzenegger's affinity for these Nazi-like machinations, it is worth noting the ties that the California governor has with one of the Nazis' most notorious soldiers: Kurt Waldheim.

Writing for Slate Magazine, Timothy Noah detailed the Schwarzenegger/Waldheim connection: Arnold Schwarzenegger has a well-documented longtime friendship with Kurt Waldheim, whom he invited to his wedding in Massachusetts in 1986. At the time, Waldheim, a former United Nations secretary-general, was running a successful campaign that would see him elected to the Austrian presidency, while conveniently "forgetting" his own central role in Nazi atrocities. Waldheim didn't attend the wedding, but Schwarzenegger offered a tribute that stunned the assemblage into shocked silence:

"My friends don't want me to mention Kurt's name, because of all the recent Nazi stuff and the U.N. controversy, but I love him and Maria does too, and so thank you. Kurt."

After the wedding, Schwarzenegger permitted Waldheim to use his name on campaign posters, protested a year later when Waldheim, then president of Austria, was banned from entering the United States, and was seen in Waldheim's company as recently as 1998 (according to the New York Post), just five years prior to being elected governor of California.

Schwarzenegger's New California StormTroopers: The Log Cabin Republicans

In 2003, and again in 2006, the radical homosexual group Log Cabin Republicans helped to get Schwarzenegger elected and reelected governor of California. Like Germany's Nazi Party, homosexuality and vehemenous anti-christianity are key components of the Log Cabin Republicans. The Log Cabin Republicans describe Christian Conservatives this way on their website:

Talking Points: Why It's Okay Being A Gay Republican
"Defeating the radical right and transforming the GOP will allow gay and lesbian Americans to achieve full equality much sooner-decades sooner. The radical right represents the last obstacle on the path to full equality. Defeat them in the grassroots of the GOP and all of us can enjoy the benefits of liberty much sooner."

In 2006, Governor Schwarzenegger rewarded California's Log Cabin Republicans and their insidious attacks on California's religious and conservative communities by being their keynote speaker for the organization's fundraiser. Also at that event was lesbian San Diego District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis who presented the Log Cabin Republican's American Visibility award to Desperate Housewives Creator and Executive Producer Marc Cherry. The Log Cabin Republicans are currently engaged in campaigns to pressure congress to put homosexuality into federal hate crimes legislation. Hate crimes legislation is being used in many states to censor opposition to the homosexual movement, as well as an educational tool for indoctrinating school children into the homosexual lifestyle. If Adolph Hitler were alive today, he would certainly be proud of the work that the Log Cabin Republicans are doing.

This has been a James Hartline Report Update.
Now Read Daily By Over 15,000 Concerned Citizens Of Conviction.

I Am Making My Stand!
Have You Started Making Yours Yet?

You can read other major Christian Conservative news stories
at California Christian News:
www.californiachristian.org

James Hartline, Publisher
The James Hartline Report
Educating The Church
Fighting For Our Generation

7 comments:

MauraHennessey said...

Mr Hartline;
It was simply way over the top and beyond the lines as far as an op-ed piece. To compare a group that was one of the targets of the Holocaust to perpetrators of the Holocaust takes both more than a bit of recklessness and a well reasoned argument. Alas, you had only the first in abundant quantities. A government's officials objecting to discrimination is not akin to persecution. That the Scouts do good I do not debate. That the Scouts still discriminate against gays you have documented in your own essay.
Gay and Lesbian activists will object to public funds going to support people who engage in policies antithetical to them, just as you and the organizations that you are affiliated with object but on a larger scale and in areas of public policy. The hyperbolic comparasions that you engage in your article move it from the realm of being part of political and social dialogue to the murky environs of propaganda. You bend the facts to the point where they are dubious allies of the truth. You use loaded terms and comparasions. At this point your effect ceases to be so much as to inform as to incite. This is beneath what should be the purpose of an educated person. Why not lift the tone of the debate and present facts and your beliefs about homosexuality without this type of disappointing behaviour? Then we all could have real political and social debate on the issues that trouble you and many of your colleagues and the issues that trouble those on my side as well.

Anonymous said...

Wow, talk about "projection."

If anyone is acting like Hitler, it is you, demonizing anyone who disagrees with your neofascist positions.

The Boy Scouts aren't being evicted, they are being told they can't get a free ride anymore, while thumbing their noses at the taxpayers. They are free to pay for their space, or move on - just like everyone else.

What is fascist is demanding that people who don't agree with them still have to subsidize them.

James Hartline said...

Using your train of "logic" then:
"What is fascist is demanding that people who don't agree with them still have to subsidize them."
means that the government and the radical gay agenda are facists for forcing the millions of Christians to pay for gay centers around this nation with tax dollars even though Christians don't believe in or agree with their agenda at all.

MauraHennessey said...

Mr Hartline;
In fairness Sir, every Gay and Lesbian in America pays taxes that support faith based intitiative funding of programmes exemmpted from discrimation laws because they are Church-related. That particular knife cuts both ways, Sir.

James Hartline said...

Churches are not trying to extinguish the youth programs offered by the Boy Scouts no matter where those programs are operating. On the contrary, extremist elements of the gay rights movement, including those who are affiliated with the San Diego Gay and Lesbian Center, have been on a mission to force the Boy Scouts out of all public property. It matters not to these radical activists that thousands of young kids will no longer be able to participate in valuable programs within a safe environment. Indeed, these radical activists are willing to sacrifice the programs that benefit these kids, many of whom live in great poverty, so that they can push forth their radicalized sexuality vision for America. The Boy Scouts were never, ever considered problematic or discriminatory until this new breed of radicalized sexual anarchists created an environment in which only they claim discrimination.
Millions of Americans are forced against their will to fund gay and lesbian activist centers around America. The San Diego Gay and Lesbian Center receives over $2 million in public funds, much of which is spent on the promotion of homosexuality. And this particular gay and lesbian center was actively involved in the campaign to evict the Boy Scouts from their property in San Diego's Balboa Park.

Your classification of discrimination has nothing to do with the historical and classical definitions of discrimination. You want people to embrace your sexual ideas and practices even if it violates the religious beliefs of those you seek to intrude upon by judicial force and tyranny. You decided to rebel against the society norm and you decided to create a sexualized dictatorial process that now, in very recent times, gains an advantage by marginalizing Christian believers and through radical judicial activism, thus victimizing youth groups like the Boy Scouts.

And as to fairness: What is fair about creating so much suffering and loss among Philadelphia's 69,000 Boy Scouts (many who live in poverty and disadvantagement) who will no longer be able to go to camp or youth programs because homosexual activists could not force their beliefs on that organization?

And as to fairness: mocking me on other websites by demeaning my research, is again, the typical approach of many radical homosexual activists who cannot win debates based upon intellectual prowess or correct analysis and conclusion, but instead, are left to disintegrate into superficiality, profanity and comatose-like name-calling.

MauraHennessey said...

Starting from your last point, Mr. Hartline, I do not recall ever mocking your research. I have had study model quibbling with some researchers. I do not recall ever critiquing your work.
I am unaware for any concerted call to destroy the BSA. I do know that some in the LGBT community have that level of anger at their discriminatory practices. The eviction of public property will undoubtedly lead to the needs for funds to pay for new quarters in Philadelphia.
Some churches are trying to derail or extinguis the move to LGBT rights and equality. I deny you the right to use the term churches in a general sense, since many churches do not support your position and you do not have the authority to speak on behalf of all Christianity. Further, I am unaware of anything radical about my sexuality and am unsure what a radicalized sexuality vision would be.
People only support LGBT centres in areas that have them, and most funding from municipalities to those centres is earmarked for treatment and support for HIV patients and psychotherapy services.
Very honestly Sir, your prediliction for hyperbole ruins your arguments, though I suspect that beyond the hyperbole you've little to offer in the way of logic. I would be delighted if you prove me wrong; only then could we have dialogue and discourse.

James Hartline said...

This is a Christian blog. We only recognize those who have been born again, filled with God's Holy Spirit and who are advocating a life submitted to the teachings of Jesus Christ as taught in the Bible, as the only credible individuals for criticizing Christians. If you are in rebellion to God, you can certainly judge those who are lost in the world without a true knowledge of Jesus Christ as Lord. However, you have no authority to tell Christians whether they are in right or wrong standing with God. As a Christian who is born again and no longer living in sin, I have absolutely no obligation to prove anything to anyone who is rebellion to God.

And the Boy Scouts have never discriminated. They have always been a moral organization. Those involved in homosexuality have chosen NOT to submit themselves to the Boy Scouts' moral standards. As such, the Boy Scouts have every right to exclude those who do not want to submit to their moral rules and standards.

Homosexuality has always been considered an immorality. Only those engaged in the recent times of promoting homosexuality have decided that others are discriminating against them because those who call homosexuality sinful will not subject their moral standards to ones that accept the sin of homosexuality.

The Bible states that God is holy and we who are truly following God are to seek to be holy as He is holy. Jesus said to repent and to be saved. If you are not repenting of your sins and seeking to be holy then you have no credibility when it comes to telling Christians what a church is or what it's purpose is.